ABSTRACT
In this paper, we explore the perception of finger motions of virtual characters. In three experiments, designed to investigate finger animations, we asked the following questions: When are errors in finger motion noticeable? What are the consequences of these errors? What animation method should we recommend? We found that synchronization errors of as little as 0.1s can be detected, but that the perceptibility of errors is highly dependent on the type of motion. Errors in finger animations can change the interpretation of a scene even without altering its perceived quality. Finally, out of the four conditions tested -- original motion capture, no motions, keyframed animation and randomly selected motions -- the original motion captured movements were rated as having the highest quality.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
In our article, we present three perceptual experiments. Accordingly, we prepared three short videos. Each one displays a selection of clips used in the respective experiment.
- Albrecht, I., Haber, J., and Seidel, H.-P. 2003. Construction and animation of anatomically based human hand models. In SCA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 98--109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., and Young, A. W. 2004. Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception 33, 6, 717--746.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Becket, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S., and Stone, M. 1994. Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1994, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 413--420. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cassell, J., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., and Bickmore, T. 2001. Beat: the behavior expression animation toolkit. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 477--486. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cutting, J. E., and Kozlowski, L. T. 1977. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9, 5, 353--356.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ElKoura, G., and Singh, K. 2003. Handrix: animating the human hand. In SCA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium On Computer Animation, 110--119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hodgins, J. K., O'Brien, J. F., and Tumblin, J. 1998. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 4, 4, 307--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johansson, G. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14, 2, 201--211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liu, K. C. 2009. Dextrous manipulation from a grasping pose. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 3 (Aug.), 3:1--3:6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Majkowska, A., Zordan, V. B., and Faloutsos, P. 2006. Automatic splicing for hand and body animations. In SCA '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 309--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mather, G., and Murdoch, L. 1994. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 258, 273--279.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonnell, R., Ennis, C., Dobbyn, S., and O'Sullivan, C. 2009. Talking bodies: Sensitivity to desynchronization of conversations. In APGV '09: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.Google Scholar
- McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: what gestures reveal about thought. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Napier, J. 1980. Hands. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Palastanga, N., Field, D., and Soames, R. 2006. Anatomy and Human Movement -- Structure and Function, 5 ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Reitsma, P. S. A., and Pollard, N. S. 2003. Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion. In ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, no. 3 (July), 537--542. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stone, M., DeCarlo, D., Oh, I., Rodriguez, C., Stere, A., Lees, A., and Bregler, C. 2004. Speaking with hands: creating animated conversational characters from recordings of human performance. In ACM Transactions on Graphics 23, no. 3 (Aug.), 506--513. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sueda, S., Kaufman, A., and Pai, D. K. 2008. Musculotendon simulation for hand animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3 (Aug.), 3:1--3:8. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The perception of finger motions
Recommendations
Evaluating the distinctiveness and attractiveness of human motions on realistic virtual bodies
Recent advances in rendering and data-driven animation have enabled the creation of compelling characters with impressive levels of realism. While data-driven techniques can produce animations that are extremely faithful to the original motion, many ...
Sleight of hand: perception of finger motion from reduced marker sets
I3D '12: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and GamesSubtle animation details such as finger or facial movements help to bring virtual characters to life and increase their appeal. However, it is not always possible to capture finger animations simultaneously with full-body motion, due to limitations of ...
Data-driven finger motion synthesis for gesturing characters
Capturing the body movements of actors to create animations for movies, games, and VR applications has become standard practice, but finger motions are usually added manually as a tedious post-processing step. In this paper, we present a surprisingly ...
Comments