skip to main content
10.1145/1836248.1836273acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The perception of finger motions

Published:23 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we explore the perception of finger motions of virtual characters. In three experiments, designed to investigate finger animations, we asked the following questions: When are errors in finger motion noticeable? What are the consequences of these errors? What animation method should we recommend? We found that synchronization errors of as little as 0.1s can be detected, but that the perceptibility of errors is highly dependent on the type of motion. Errors in finger animations can change the interpretation of a scene even without altering its perceived quality. Finally, out of the four conditions tested -- original motion capture, no motions, keyframed animation and randomly selected motions -- the original motion captured movements were rated as having the highest quality.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Albrecht, I., Haber, J., and Seidel, H.-P. 2003. Construction and animation of anatomically based human hand models. In SCA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 98--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., and Young, A. W. 2004. Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception 33, 6, 717--746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Becket, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S., and Stone, M. 1994. Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1994, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 413--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cassell, J., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., and Bickmore, T. 2001. Beat: the behavior expression animation toolkit. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cutting, J. E., and Kozlowski, L. T. 1977. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9, 5, 353--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. ElKoura, G., and Singh, K. 2003. Handrix: animating the human hand. In SCA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium On Computer Animation, 110--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hodgins, J. K., O'Brien, J. F., and Tumblin, J. 1998. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 4, 4, 307--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Johansson, G. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14, 2, 201--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Liu, K. C. 2009. Dextrous manipulation from a grasping pose. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 3 (Aug.), 3:1--3:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Majkowska, A., Zordan, V. B., and Faloutsos, P. 2006. Automatic splicing for hand and body animations. In SCA '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 309--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mather, G., and Murdoch, L. 1994. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 258, 273--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. McDonnell, R., Ennis, C., Dobbyn, S., and O'Sullivan, C. 2009. Talking bodies: Sensitivity to desynchronization of conversations. In APGV '09: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: what gestures reveal about thought. The University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Napier, J. 1980. Hands. New York: Pantheon Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Palastanga, N., Field, D., and Soames, R. 2006. Anatomy and Human Movement -- Structure and Function, 5 ed. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Reitsma, P. S. A., and Pollard, N. S. 2003. Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion. In ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, no. 3 (July), 537--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Stone, M., DeCarlo, D., Oh, I., Rodriguez, C., Stere, A., Lees, A., and Bregler, C. 2004. Speaking with hands: creating animated conversational characters from recordings of human performance. In ACM Transactions on Graphics 23, no. 3 (Aug.), 506--513. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sueda, S., Kaufman, A., and Pai, D. K. 2008. Musculotendon simulation for hand animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3 (Aug.), 3:1--3:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The perception of finger motions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      APGV '10: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization
      July 2010
      171 pages
      ISBN:9781450302487
      DOI:10.1145/1836248

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 July 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate19of33submissions,58%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader